Silvetti expressed some concern in the manner in which architecture today is produced and taught. He expresses his opinions about contemporary blob architecture as unintellectual, and without reason. at least, besides the fact that "we can." He expresses disappointment in the mindless embracing of such architecture and in some respects addresses it as the most weakening formal development of contemporary architecture. He suggests that we do not use insights of other fields as literal translations of architecture, but as metaphors to enrich meanings.
I believe that his opinion of contemporary architecture is too narrow. Some examples of blob architecture make strong connections to their site, and are thought out through flow of circulation, as well as other dynamic expressions that cannot be contained in orthogonal confinements. The relationships made in some literal architectural buildings are a progression of metaphorical insights. And this research of change and advancement of architecture, while perhaps a little unorthodox, responds to conditions that architects have never before responded to so directly. We must first properly analyze the influences and effects of these buildings on human productivity, and experience before we judge the intent, and acceptance of these buildings.